













AI Confidence Without Evidence
Spotting and preventing 'truth flavored data' in product work
If you could invite the sharpest minds in UX Research, Product, and Design to dinner in Chicago, who would you choose?
...for us, it's you.
This June, we’re setting the table for something special. The Insight Exchange, a complimentary, intimate dinner series hosted by Askable.
Each dinner we host brings together UX, product, and research leaders for a single, focused conversation. The kind that doesn’t happen at conferences. No panels. No pitches. Just a small group in the same room, working through the same problems.
For this dinner, we’re starting from a finding that stopped us in our tracks.
In research conducted by Askable with 30 UX, product, and research practitioners, 22 out of 23 described real time savings from AI. But only 7 described AI as embedded in ways that also held up on quality. Speed is the easy win. The harder question is whether the work being produced faster is work teams would stand behind.
We’re calling it AI confidence without evidence: the gap between moving fast and working well. It shows up as a plausible-sounding synthesis that glosses over nuance. As outputs that are 60-80% right, which is enough to be useful but not enough to trust without checking. As teams building on foundations that AI is quietly exposing.
The roundtable will be facilitated by Liz Steelman and focused on how product and UX teams are closing that gap: the governance, capability, and integration decisions that turn individual AI wins into something the whole team and your stakeholders can actually rely on.
While your competitors settle for truth-flavored data, you’ll have the real thing. That’s the conversation.
What to expect:
- $50 Uber voucher for travel to / from dinner
- Cocktail hour prior to dinner
- Relatable UX was stories
- New connections and ways of thinking
RPM Seafood



.png)



