Product updates

Device fingerprinting now spots repeat scammers automatically. Linked accounts get banned so you do not have to play detective.

The participant home screen is now randomised. Studies fill more evenly, the "first hour rush" is history, and every participant gets a fairer shot.

Keep your compliance team happy. Teams can now add a custom privacy policy URL and require participant acknowledgement before sessions begin.

Restructured your study? The new Evidence Re-linking Agent automatically reconnects evidence to the right insights. No manual cleanup required.

‍

Ask AI just levelled up. Claude Sonnet 4.6 brings faster responses, sharper reasoning, and smoother long conversations.

You can now turn insights from Ask AI into clear, shareable research docs — without leaving Askable. Docs gives teams a dedicated place to shape, organise, and share AI-generated insights with evidence still attached.

We’re improving how participants get started on Askable, with early quality checks designed to create a smoother sign-up experience and a stronger pipeline of ready-to-go participants — especially on mobile.

You can now filter results across an entire unmoderated study and review everything in a single, continuous view — making large studies faster to analyse and easier to share.

Following up on large studies no longer means clicking one invite at a time. You can now bulk resend invites to participants who are already Invited or Waitlisted — making it faster to fill quotas and keep studies moving.

Reviewing open answer responses just got faster. The Open Answer block in Unmoderated Studies now includes an AI-generated summary, helping you quickly understand key themes without reading every response.

AI-moderated interviews now run directly inside the Askable Participant App, giving participants a smoother, more reliable experience — and helping teams get higher-quality responses from the start.

You can now run variant comparison directly inside Unmoderated Studies — testing two options and capturing both which version participants prefer and the reasoning behind their choice.